How we can green our Summer
Thank you for visiting Super Eco

Join the Super Eco CommunitySign In

Stricter carbon market after Davos?

Photo credit: pfala, flickr

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, BP's executive director Tony Hayward expressed the need for a broadened emissions trading program, and a worldwide standard carbon price. Hayward also said that the price of oil needs to rise in order to encourage investment. Currently, individual governments establish a cap on the amount of carbon corporations are allowed to emit into the atmosphere. The European Union has a carbon trading system in place; the United States has no federal program, though several states have enacted carbon cap-and-trade systems of their own.

There are signs, however, that the current administration will allow tougher regulations on companies that pollute. President Obama said he will review a waiver request that would allow a dozen states to make car manufacturers adhere to stricter greenhouse gas standards.

The EU system is not perfect, however. There have been allegations that corporations have been receiving carbon permits for free, essentially negating what is supposed to be a penalty for excessive polluting.

Though the carbon trading system exists, it clearly is quite flawed. Perhaps intelligence gained at the Forum in Davos will help create a clearer path forward.

 

This story around the web

Related profile pages

Companies
BP
People
Tony Hayward
Definitions
Carbon market, Cap and trade

Filed Under: Global » Categories: Cars, Global Politics » Topics: Environmental leaders, Gas mileage

Next Article Tequila! Previous Article Do you Twitter?

Comments (1)Add a Comment

Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed.

Reply
Avatar Frank Paynter external link (2:13 PM on Fri Jan 30, 2009)

Good post Jonathan! Regarding the "free" emissions credits in the EU, I think that refers to the initial set-up, when it seemed like the National Allocation Plans gave the biggest polluters emissions credits that exceeded the amount of pollution they were putting in the air. Based on that, given the free market nature of cap-and-trade, those companies whose allocations were excessive essentially received a subsidy... they can sell those credits back to someone who needs them. Since the annual caps get smaller and smaller, this one time "subsidy" will seem less important over time.

The over-allocation problem that you reference was visible 2005 when the trading began. I don't think 2008 reports will be skewed by it. Even so, I agree with you when you say the system is "quite flawed."

Ireland is about to implement a cap-and-share system on fossil fuels (cap the carbon, share the income). That's a way for you and me to have a stake in the game and to get money back if we reduce our carbon footprint. I like it!

Add a comment

Email Me
  
Comment Preview
Avatar Anonymous (4:15 PM on Thu Jul 29, 2010)

Preview your comment here.

Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed. To create a clickable link, simply type the URL (including http://) and we will make a link for you. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags, but if you're into that kind of thing, you can use any of the following tags: b, i, strong, em, a (href only), p and br.


Thursday, 07/29/2010

want to love "big green change" / super eco shows you how /  to begin today... http://bit.ly/1dTmG

Retweet this Tip!